Sales Leader Guide· a Bicycle Guide

Coming soon · Book Profile

Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research

A systematic, science-based method for designing survey questions, predicting their measurement quality before data collection, and correcting for measurement error in analysis.

A profile of this book is on the way.

Get the book →

What it’s about

This book transforms questionnaire design from an 'art' into a scientific activity. Saris and Gallhofer present a complete program: a three-step procedure for operationalizing complex concepts into concrete survey requests, a thorough mapping of the design choices researchers face (response scales, item structure, batteries, data collection mode), and a rigorous framework for estimating the reliability, validity, and method effects of survey questions using multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) experiments. The crowning achievement is the SQP (Survey Quality Predictor) program, built on a meta-analysis of thousands of MTMM experiments across dozens of countries and languages, which predicts the quality of any survey question from its coded characteristics—before it is ever fielded. The authors then show how to use these quality estimates to correct for measurement error in substantive analyses and in cross-cultural comparisons, demonstrating that ignoring measurement quality leads to seriously biased conclusions about relationships and means.

The through-line

Who it’s for
A survey researcher or social scientist who wants to design questionnaires that accurately measure the concepts they care about and yield trustworthy results.
The problem
Survey questions contain measurement error that biases estimates of relationships and means, and there is no easy way to know a question's quality before fielding it. The researcher feels uncertain whether their data truly measure what they intend and anxious that their conclusions may be artifacts of poor questions.
The plan
  1. Operationalize complex concepts into concrete requests using the three-step procedure.
  2. Make informed choices about response scales, item structure, batteries, and data collection mode.
  3. Predict the quality of each question with SQP before fielding and improve weak questions.
  4. Estimate reliability, validity, and method effects where possible via MTMM designs.
  5. Correct correlations and estimates for measurement error in substantive analysis.
The payoff
The researcher fields higher-quality questions, knows their measurement quality in advance, obtains less biased estimates of relationships and means, and can make valid cross-cultural comparisons.

See our guide

Related profiles we’ve built

Additional reading