Sales Leader Guide· a Bicycle Guide

Coming soon · Book Profile

Structured_Interviewing_Raising

A highly structured employment interviewing technique, built on job analysis and standardized scoring, can raise the psychometric properties of the interview to the level of traditional cognitive aptitude tests.

A profile of this book is on the way.

Get the book →

What it’s about

For decades, the employment interview has been condemned by researchers as unreliable, invalid, subjective, and legally vulnerable. This study demonstrates that structuring the interview through six concrete steps—job-analysis-based questions, identical questions for every candidate, anchored rating scales, a trained interview panel, consistent administration, and rigorous attention to fairness and documentation—transforms the interview into a psychometrically sound selection device. In a field study of 149 entry-level production hires, the structured interview achieved high interrater reliability (r = .88), strong predictive validity (corrected r = .56), demonstrated fairness for minorities and women, and produced substantial economic utility. The technique's validity rivals or exceeds paper-and-pencil cognitive aptitude tests and far exceeds the traditional interview (mean r = .14), while offering managers an involving, defensible, and credible role in hiring. This is essential reading for anyone who selects employees and wants to keep the interview they love while giving it the rigor of a test.

The through-line

Who it’s for
A hiring manager, HR professional, or I-O practitioner who wants to select the best employees using the interview—a tool they trust and want to keep using.
The problem
The traditional employment interview is unreliable, of low validity, and legally vulnerable, so hiring decisions based on it are poor and defensible only with difficulty. They feel torn between their belief in interviewing and the constant research warnings that interviews don't work, leaving them uncertain their hiring choices are sound or fair.
The plan
  1. Develop interview questions from a rigorous job analysis of important, prerequisite requirements.
  2. Ask the identical set of questions of every candidate without prompting or follow-up.
  3. Anchor rating scales with concrete example answers for good, marginal, and poor responses.
  4. Assemble and train an interview panel to independently record and rate answers.
  5. Administer the process consistently to all candidates and average ratings equally.
The payoff
Hiring decisions are reliable, valid, and predictive of actual job performance. · Selection is demonstrably fair to minorities and women and legally defensible. · The organization gains substantial economic utility from better hires.

See our guide

Related profiles we’ve built

Additional reading